Bold claims, but that energy density would be amazing.

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    A PR number would be “300% the capacity of current batteries with the same weight”. A mile range is just bullshit, and the “journalist” just parroted it out without second thought.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      have you met muricans? you mention “capacity” and half would assume you are talking trunk space

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Sorry bud but I think you are being pedantic here. It is basically industry standard (again, Murica driven) to advertise specs in whatever freedom units rubes would most easily swallow

          You are not wrong but you act like this is your first day finding out about marketing

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I assure you I am not being pedantic. This isn’t a PR. It’s supposed to be a critical article about a PR. And it does a terrible job at it. And that’s what I’m complaining about.