Luigi Mangione has drawn lots of defenders on social media. That’s a challenge for platforms when it comes to moderation — and for users.

Archived link of the article

    • BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because you can’t let people realize that they are not alone with their opinions about rich people. That’s the first step to change, and you can’t have that.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        We are in a abusive relationship with capitalism. Straight up Stockholm Syndrome with our oppressors.

      • bradd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I guarantee there is a way to have a discussion about the validity of Luigi’s motives without it seeming like a call for more murder in the streets.

    • phughes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The word they’re avoiding is “suppress”. It needs to be suppressed because they don’t want anymore CEOs getting what they deserve.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because if you let it go enough, people will break the law and someone will come knocking on the instance owners door.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because it’s typically the glorification of murder, the incitement of murder, or the direct threat of murder, which are all typically illegal in most jurisdictions.