

This article is reductive to the point of uselessness. By this logic, burning human bodies for steam power would count as solar because we are all star dust.
This article is reductive to the point of uselessness. By this logic, burning human bodies for steam power would count as solar because we are all star dust.
If that’s a chai latte you’ve hit the nail on my head
Don’t you think all of that is arbitrary? Why are tattoos more masculine “unless you pick feminine designs”? Where does the judgement of feminine/ not feminine come from in the first place?
I think they’re trying to smear Pedro. They refer to his tweet as an attack and bring up his trans sister twice, implying that he only cares because his family is affected. The language they use to talk about JKR is, by contrast, much more sympathetic.
This is exactly the reference I was making
It’s great if you can handle its pea-ness.
Life is like a bowl of gagh; best to take a bite while it’s still wriggling.
Only if the big sword was hurled by a watery tart
We don’t know what’s in lembas bread
Whatever you call it, don’t let Janeway near it.
(Just kidding, Tuvix deserved what it got)
Rural parts of Europe are much smaller than rural parts of America. The challenges are different and the comparison doesn’t quite fit.
I feel similarly to that. I’ve always chafed under the “Man” label because it never felt like it fit despite my being generally masculine. So now I don’t bother with labelling myself unless pressed.
All that to say that public transit doesn’t really enter the conversation for me about rural areas except as something we ought to do,
That’s basically what I said in my first sentence of my first reply
You completely misunderstood my point by only talking about cities and suburban sprawl, which isn’t what I was talking about at all. Rural areas exist. Rural areas will continue to exist because farming requires a lot of land. People still live in those areas and will continue to do so. It would genuinely be a waste of resources to service those areas with public transit. Single family EVs are a better alternative for those areas because the logistical challenges of public transit get more and more difficult the further you get from a city.
I get that you hate cars enough to write a book in response to a couple sentences, but you need to realize that not everyone lives in the city or even in suburban sprawl. Yes cities need to be re
True, but good public transit is only really feasible at suburban population densities or higher.
High speed rail would work for linking rural communities together, but half of the people in those areas don’t live within walking/biking distance of town (especially when needing to transport goods) so the adoption of EVs should still be encouraged.
Which Fox News commentator is your source one that?
Yes, that is the point I was making.