NaN naan Jeremy that’s insane

there aren’t that many, if you’re talking specifically LLMs, but ML+AI is more than LLMs.

Not a defence or indictment of either side, just people tend to confuse the terms “LLM” and “AI”

I think there could be worth in AI for identification (what insect in this, find the photo I took of the receipt for my train ticket last month, order these chemicals from lowest to highest pH…) - but LLMs are only part of that stack - the input and output - which isn’t going to make many massive breakthroughs week to week.

three of the six falls into the gap between the 7 and 10, leaving 3 sticking out the top = 13.

I have no idea if this is normal or not

Matt 15:20 is literally “These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”

Also,

1 Cor 6:7 "The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. "

Sassy aka The Baboo aka Der Stinkus

marked as duplicate. closed.

super minor but I always preferred to define fizzbuzz as modulo 3*5 to show adherence to the instructions in the readability of the code without having to think about why

I think the intent of the comment was meant to be sarcastic? not sure

KG is a big Trumper

no racism

I mean the whole point of the post is faux-xenophobia

Programming is definitely not an exact science.

Armchair amateur here but there’s often a lot of talk about O(n), memory optimization, trash cleanup, compression methods, race conditions, vertex choice in matrices etc…

It reminds me of the neo-plasticists, whose argument was there is no significant difference between painting a farmer next to a pile of hay vs painting a pink square next to a yellow square: both are just arranging representative symbols on a canvas.

Art fulfills many practical purposes. You live in an abode designed by architects, presumably painted and furnished with many objects d’art such as, a couch, a wardrobe, ceiling fixtures, a bathtub; also presumably festooned with art on the walls; you cook and eat food in designed cookware, crockery and cutlery, and that food is frequently more than pure sustenance; and, presumably you spend a fair amount of time consuming media such as television, film, literature, music, comedy, dance, or even porn.

Come on, now! Asking me if I support voter intimidation is both a straw man and begging the question and you know it.

That’s not really the point under discussion, is it?

You said there were no politicians who would advocate for voting in general. I just googled up a bunch of quotes to the contrary. I’m sure I could find governers, senators, mayors too but I was focusing on presidents.

In fact, in regards to Hayes, Bush Trump - isn’t losing the popular, but taking the presidency due to process actually an excellent case for more voter rights and less restrictions on the voting process?

And what the hell does the Compromise of 1877 have to do with giving voters water?

Once again, because I feel like you’re derailing here by attempting to drag this discussion into 200 year old minutiae, should we not be able to make voting an easy, relaxing, simple, comfortable process and isn’t that better for society?

"There’s no such thing as a vote that doesn’t matter. It all matters.”— Barack Obama

“To vote is like the payment of a debt, a duty never to be neglected, if its performance is possible.” –Rutherford B. Hayes

“The future of this republic is in the hands of the American voter.” –Dwight D. Eisenhower

“Elections belong to the people. It’s their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.” – Abraham Lincoln

“The vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men.” –Lyndon B. Johnson

“Nobody will ever deprive the American people of the right to vote except the American people themselves, and the only way they could do this is by not voting.” –Franklin D. Roosevelt

buddy you just did the same thing to me.

I just don’t agree with your assertion that voter disenfranchisement efforts are necessarily a function of an incumbent party. There are many politicians who want people to vote even if it’s not for them.

In other countries going to vote is a sub-15 min task, you can do it on your way to work/school. in the US it can be a multi-hour experience which is designed to be as difficult as possible.

More older people vote than young people, so perhaps the whataboutism question here should be, “why do you want to torture older people?”

no, it does not. this is a false narrative designed to obfuscate voter suppression.

in general it’s telling people who to vote for

in context it’s telling people who to vote for while in line

the “joke” I was making is that handing people water while in line does not support a specific party