• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Those were obviously rhetorical question marks.

        The information you’re pretending to be interested in is readily available in the article above and elsewhere.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          From OC:

          Those things, from what I heard, are an absolute necessity of an upgrade for postal workers.

          emphasis mine.

          You’re acting like it is obvious what they heard, and I shouldn’t ask for details of what looks like first hand reports of usage of the new vehicles.

          So go fuck yourselves and the high horses you rode in on.

          • Lvdwsn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Just FYI a comment isn’t an article, you gotta click on the link at the top of the page and read the article, which is what he’s suggesting you read. That’s where you can find the details.

            • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              I cannot make it any clearer: I am interested in @AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 's account. He said he heard opinions about the new cars, I suppose it’s from drivers. I’d love to hear more. From AceFuzzLord. Or did they write the article?

              • Lvdwsn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                He read it in the article that was posted is what we’re all saying. Why don’t you read it? That’s what his comment was referring to, because he commented on the article. Hope this helps!