The basis for my theory:

If we developed warp drive, genetic manipulation, and transporter tech, I’d reckon even before that we’d first figure out how to make dogs live for hundreds of years. Because that’s easier and of course we would.

I’ve seen people post that it must have been like Porthos v9 because of the time difference, but there’s no way that dog didn’t outlive Archer by decades, because if we’re going to do anything good as a species, it will be making sure our dogs outlive us.

So Scotty lost the OG Porthos.

e: better phrasing

  • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    because if we’re going to do anything good as a species, it will be making sure our dogs outlive us

    So, funny thing about this, is it’s not at all true. I have a friend who is a vet, and he quite succinctly clarified with some good journal articles that the real issue with dogs’ short lives is we just don’t care. If we had been breeding for longer lives at any point, they would have no issue with living for decades longer than their current spans. It’s never been a priority (and might even be a poor business decision) for breeders to focus on longevity. Even health is only a passing concern for their ‘working’ period.

    Maybe humanity will become better. Someday.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of the reasons that cats tend to live longer than dogs there’s a lot of cats are just general muggies, they basically bread themselves.

      You can always tell something funky has happened when there’s a litter of black and white cats and then a random orange one in the mix. There’s always some throwback to an earlier ancestor. But that basically never happens in dogs.