• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      their old grumman LLV’s are inefficient, cramped, HOT AS FUCK (no climate control you get a fan lol) that were harder and harder to keep on the road after nearly 4 decades of work. also, a tremendous amount of ‘postal work’ is not letters, but now packages - and these vehicles can’t hold much compared to the new ones.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        4 days ago

        According to Wikipedia, the Grumman LLV was in production from 1986—1994… Which seems kinda wild to me in 2025.

        Also according to Wikipedia, when used for mail delivery, its average fuel economy is 8.2—10 mpg 😬

              • unphazed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Mine was a 94. An F250 pulled out in front of me. I braked, tried to swerve into the side street. He reversed. Wet road, I kept sliding. He had a dented door. I had a broken radiator, crushed hood, and bent front axle. Totalled. To the guy’s credit, he admitted he never saw me coming in my wittle red twuck and that I fought like hell to avoid a collision, and probably would have if he hadn’t reversed. Blue Book was 5k. I got 3k. No one was selling them at the time for less than 5k and I had a minimum wage job and needed a car asap. Got a neon and a bonus: no more moving requests.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, that’s quite an improvement for the company. How do the new ones improve the life of mail carriers specifically?